Reacting to a proposed move by the state Water Resources Control Board to revoke U.S. Bureau of Reclamation water rights on the American River connected to the long-stalled Auburn dam, U.S. Rep. John Doolittle has lodged a protest with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Joined by all 18 other members of California’s Republican House delegation, Doolittle is urging Schwarzenegger to take steps to halt the proposed revocation of water rights gained by the federal government in 1971 for storage and use of water from what was envisioned to be a multipurpose dam.
The state water board has scheduled a pre-hearing conference in June and a revocation hearing in July in Sacramento to take away four bureau permits allowing use of up to 2.5 million acre-feet of the river’s water.
Doolittle wrote that while construction of the dam has been delayed since the late 1970s, existing water rights are “a valuable potential source of much-needed water.”
“As recent conditions demonstrate, now is not the time for the State Water Resources Control Board to be using its resources to decrease potential water supply for the state,” Doolittle said. “The existing water rights for the Auburn dam would assist in our combined efforts to provide California’s residents with adequate water supply.”
While Doolittle is fighting the revocation effort, the president of a local group opposed to the dam said that the water board is “simply performing its obligation to revoke the water rights for a project that has shown no meaningful movement toward completion for more than 30 years.”
“Under California law, water rights may not be retained indefinitely on the speculative hope that some day the permit holder may be able to appropriate water as contemplated in the permit,” Protect American River Canyons President Tim Woodall said.
While dam proponents and opponents gird for yet another round of discussion on the merits of the megaproject, the Placer County Water Agency is taking a neutral stance on revocation.
The agency, however, wants to ensure that if water rights are revoked, it is on record with a request that any resulting unappropriated water be reserved as a supply for unmet local needs.
Agency Strategic Affairs Director Einar Maisch said the agency does see an opportunity to possibly secure additional rights on the American River for the county and possibly others within the watershed. The agency has consistently protected its status as area-of-origin water rights holder on the American River watershed.
The agency board voted Thursday to inform the water board that if revocation occurs, the water should be reserved for local water purveyors to meet current and future demands. The board voted 3-0 in favor of the motion. Auburn-area director Lowell Jarvis, an employee of the state Water Resources Control Board, abstained from voting because of a potential conflict of interest. East Placer County director Otis Wollan was absent.
“Fifty years ago, PCWA was formed to protect and perfect water supplies of the American River in our county for local use,” board chairman Mike Lee said. “This board stands ready to once again do the same for future generations should any additional water become available on the river by any action of the state water board.”
The Journal’s Gus Thomson can be reached at gust@goldcountrymedia.com.
|
Not registered? Click here
|
E-mail this
|
Print this
|









Otis Wallen has been in the job too long. Its time for a change on that guy. He is selling our water to Southern California and then raising our rates.
Recent tragic events in China show that perhaps building a really large dam using an outdated and obsolete design, over a site that contains 4 earthquake faults and crumbly baserock, located upriver of one of the country's most important resevoirs, (which is already using the water, btw) is not a good idea.
But that has never stopped Doolittle.
Of course, if the water was needed locally one could just, perhaps, build some sort of big intake valve on the river bank and just suck that water out of there as it runs by during the summer....
... oh wait, we already did that recently.
CanyonRat, I think you're missing the big picture here. If California's Republican delegation doesn't stand up for Federal rights over local rights and control, who will?
I'm a Republican and have always opposed the Dam. Quit painting Republicans with such a wide brush.
R_T is correct when he says the water will go to So. Cal. Even on drought years their reservoirs are full while ours are empty, guess where the water came from.
Let me offer a suggestion to those that would love to politicize the Dam. Let's work together to keep it from being built rather than split our forces and see that monstruosity swallow that beautiful canyon.
Who cares what Doolittle wants? He's done little for taxpayers during his terms of service. Good riddance to bad rubbish.
NashGrumbler: I thought that the Republicans were the party of STATE'S rights.
CA and the Bureau are actually interested in water ? 450 CA agencies & the Bureau have been offered a totally new fresh water Source of ONE MILLION acre feet a year and won't risk one key stroke to communicate. Development of the Source has been guaranteed not damage the environment or the water rights of others. WaterSource waterrdw@yahoo.com
Don't y'all get a little misty eyed when Congressperson Mary Bono, member of the Republican delegation, sides with Johnny D supporting taxing her constituents to pay for a dam in faraway Auburn. Sounds more more like a Leeberal position to me. Must be because her district is water-rich with no needs of their own.
What's that you say? She's from Palm Springs which is a bone dry desert and paved all the way across? With developer money available to politicians like....er...water?
Well how the heck could all that be connected?